Allied Vision Alvium G1-158m alternative from Hikrobot
Hikrobot replacement options for the Allied Vision Alvium G1-158m: the closest models, what differs (resolution, frame rate, interface, sensor) and what to check before switching.
Comparison with Hikrobot models
Hikrobot MV-CS016-11GM matches the Alvium G1-158m on resolution, frame rate and interface.
Check before ordering:
Frame height: 1080 instead of 1088 px (-0.74 %).
Frame width: 1440 instead of 1456 px (-1.1 %).
Software, SDK, connectors, mount and dimensions require a separate engineering check.
The lens mount differs: check the fit and the flange distance of your current lens.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -1.1 % in width, -0.74 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
To confirm a model for your line, send: current lens, working distance, field of view, object speed, cable length and software.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
The lens mount differs: check the fit and the flange distance of your current lens.
Frame height: 1080 instead of 1088 px (-0.74 %).
Frame width: 1440 instead of 1456 px (-1.1 %).
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -1.1 % in width, -0.74 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
The lens mount differs: check the fit and the flange distance of your current lens.
Frame height: 1080 instead of 1088 px (-0.74 %).
Frame width: 1440 instead of 1456 px (-1.1 %).
The sensor part number is not confirmed in this comparison: we compare by resolution, pixel size, frame or line rate and interface.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -1.1 % in width, -0.74 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Connector: M12 X-Code instead of RJ45 — the system has to be checked.
The lens mount differs: check the fit and the flange distance of your current lens.
Frame height: 1080 instead of 1088 px (-0.74 %).
Frame width: 1440 instead of 1456 px (-1.1 %).
The sensor part number is not confirmed in this comparison: we compare by resolution, pixel size, frame or line rate and interface.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -1.1 % in width, -0.74 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Connector: M12 X-Code instead of RJ45 — the system has to be checked.
The lens mount differs: check the fit and the flange distance of your current lens.
Frame height: 1080 instead of 1088 px (-0.74 %).
Frame width: 1440 instead of 1456 px (-1.1 %).
The sensor part number is not confirmed in this comparison: we compare by resolution, pixel size, frame or line rate and interface.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -1.1 % in width, -0.74 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
PoE power: optional instead of yes — the system has to be checked.
Frame rate: 65.8 instead of 74 fps (-11.08 %).
The lens mount differs: check the fit and the flange distance of your current lens.
Frame height: 1080 instead of 1088 px (-0.74 %).
Frame width: 1440 instead of 1456 px (-1.1 %).
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -1.1 % in width, -0.74 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
PoE power: optional instead of yes — the system has to be checked.
Frame rate: 65.8 instead of 74 fps (-11.08 %).
The lens mount differs: check the fit and the flange distance of your current lens.
Frame height: 1080 instead of 1088 px (-0.74 %).
Frame width: 1440 instead of 1456 px (-1.1 %).
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -1.1 % in width, -0.74 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Frame rate: 65.2 instead of 74 fps (-11.89 %).
The lens mount differs: check the fit and the flange distance of your current lens.
Frame height: 1080 instead of 1088 px (-0.74 %).
Frame width: 1440 instead of 1456 px (-1.1 %).
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -1.1 % in width, -0.74 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
Scope of the comparison. The comparison covers only the specifications listed, taken from published sources. It is not a statement of compatibility or interchangeability. Third-party names and trademarks are used solely to identify the products being compared; the rights to them belong to their respective owners. Software, SDK, connectors, mount and dimensions require a separate engineering check.