Hikrobot replacement options for the Basler acA4096-30um: the closest models, what differs (resolution, frame rate, interface, sensor) and what to check before switching.
Comparison with Hikrobot models
Hikrobot MV-CH089-10UM matches the acA4096-30um on resolution, frame rate and interface.
Check before ordering:
Frame height: 2160 instead of 2168 px (-0.37 %).
Frame rate: 32 instead of 32.3 fps (-0.93 %).
Software, SDK, connectors, mount and dimensions require a separate engineering check.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: 0 % in width, -0.37 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
To confirm a model for your line, send: current lens, working distance, field of view, object speed, cable length and software.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Frame rate: 32 instead of 32.3 fps (-0.93 %).
Frame height: 2160 instead of 2168 px (-0.37 %).
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: 0 % in width, -0.37 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Connector: Type-C instead of USB 3.0 Micro-B — the system has to be checked.
Frame height: 2160 instead of 2168 px (-0.37 %).
The sensor part number is not confirmed in this comparison: we compare by resolution, pixel size, frame or line rate and interface.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: 0 % in width, -0.37 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Connector: Type-C instead of USB 3.0 Micro-B — the system has to be checked.
Frame height: 2160 instead of 2168 px (-0.37 %).
The sensor part number is not confirmed in this comparison: we compare by resolution, pixel size, frame or line rate and interface.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: 0 % in width, -0.37 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Connector: Type-C instead of USB 3.0 Micro-B — the system has to be checked.
Frame height: 2160 instead of 2168 px (-0.37 %).
The sensor part number is not confirmed in this comparison: we compare by resolution, pixel size, frame or line rate and interface.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: 0 % in width, -0.37 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
Scope of the comparison. The comparison covers only the specifications listed, taken from published sources. It is not a statement of compatibility or interchangeability. Third-party names and trademarks are used solely to identify the products being compared; the rights to them belong to their respective owners. Software, SDK, connectors, mount and dimensions require a separate engineering check.