Verifiable specification comparison · Cognex

Cognex In-Sight 9912C alternative from Hikrobot

Hikrobot replacement options for the Cognex In-Sight 9912C: the closest models, what differs (resolution, frame rate, interface, sensor) and what to check before switching.

Comparison with Hikrobot models

No confirmed drop-in replacement. The closest Hikrobot models differ in resolution. Each difference is listed below.

To confirm a model for your line, send: current lens, working distance, field of view, object speed, cable length and software.

Continue the search
MV-SC5120XC-00C-NNN
Trade-off — needs agreement
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
  • Frame height: 2944 instead of 3000 px (-1.87 %).
The sensor part number is not confirmed in this comparison: we compare by resolution, pixel size, frame or line rate and interface.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: 0 % in width, -1.87 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
Why it is not a drop-in replacement
The table scrolls to the right →
ParameterIn-Sight 9912CMV-SC5120XC-00C-NNNWhat it changes
Resolution4096 × 3000 px4096 × 2944 pxFrame height: 2944 instead of 3000 px (-1.87 %).
InterfaceGigE · 1 Gbit/s · X-coded M12-8GigE · 1 Gbit/s · M12 8-pinConfirm from the datasheet
Sensornot publishednot publishedConfirm from the datasheet
Specification comparison
The table scrolls to the right →
SpecificationCompetitorOur modelDifference
Resolution 4096 × 3000 px 4096 × 2944 px Trade-off
Pixel size 3.45 × 3.45 µm 3.45 × 3.45 µm Matches
Sensor Not specified Not specified Confirm from the datasheet
Shutter type Global Global Matches
Mono/color Color Color Matches
Spectral range Visible range Visible range Matches
Frame rate 8 fps 30 fps Δ +22 (+275 %)
Interface GigE · 1 Gbit/s · X-coded M12-8 GigE · 1 Gbit/s · M12 8-pin Confirm from the datasheet
Lens mount C C Matches
MV-SC6120C
Trade-off — needs agreement
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
  • Frame height: 2944 instead of 3000 px (-1.87 %).
The sensor part number is not confirmed in this comparison: we compare by resolution, pixel size, frame or line rate and interface.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: 0 % in width, -1.87 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
Why it is not a drop-in replacement
The table scrolls to the right →
ParameterIn-Sight 9912CMV-SC6120CWhat it changes
Resolution4096 × 3000 px4096 × 2944 pxFrame height: 2944 instead of 3000 px (-1.87 %).
InterfaceGigE · 1 Gbit/s · X-coded M12-8GigE · 1 Gbit/s · M12 8-pinConfirm from the datasheet
Sensornot publishednot publishedConfirm from the datasheet
Specification comparison
The table scrolls to the right →
SpecificationCompetitorOur modelDifference
Resolution 4096 × 3000 px 4096 × 2944 px Trade-off
Pixel size 3.45 × 3.45 µm 3.45 × 3.45 µm Matches
Sensor Not specified Not specified Confirm from the datasheet
Shutter type Global Global Matches
Mono/color Color Color Matches
Spectral range Visible range Visible range Matches
Frame rate 8 fps 40 fps Δ +32 (+400 %)
Interface GigE · 1 Gbit/s · X-coded M12-8 GigE · 1 Gbit/s · M12 8-pin Confirm from the datasheet
Lens mount C C Matches
Other Cognex models with replacement options
In-Sight 9912C specifications
The table scrolls to the right →
SpecificationCompetitor value
Resolution 4096 × 3000 px
Pixel size 3.45 × 3.45 µm
Sensor Not specified
Shutter type Global
Mono/color Color
Spectral range Visible range
Frame rate 8 fps
Interface GigE · 1 Gbit/s · X-coded M12-8
Lens mount C
Specification sources
Manually checked: 2026-09-07
The spectral range is taken as visible: the manufacturer lists no variant of this model outside the visible range.
Scope of the comparison. The comparison covers only the specifications listed, taken from published sources. It is not a statement of compatibility or interchangeability. Third-party names and trademarks are used solely to identify the products being compared; the rights to them belong to their respective owners. Software, SDK, connectors, mount and dimensions require a separate engineering check.