Daheng Imaging MER2-1220-9GC alternative from Hikrobot
Hikrobot replacement options for the Daheng Imaging MER2-1220-9GC: the closest models, what differs (resolution, frame rate, interface, sensor) and what to check before switching.
Comparison with Hikrobot models
Hikrobot MV-CS120-10GC V5.0 matches the MER2-1220-9GC on resolution, frame rate and interface.
Check before ordering:
Software, SDK, connectors, mount and dimensions require a separate engineering check.
The lens mount differs: check the fit and the flange distance of your current lens.
To confirm a model for your line, send: current lens, working distance, field of view, object speed, cable length and software.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
The lens mount differs: check the fit and the flange distance of your current lens.
Pixel size, X: 2 instead of 1.85 µm (+8.11 %); the field of view will change with the same lens.
Pixel size, Y: 2 instead of 1.85 µm (+8.11 %); the field of view will change with the same lens.
Frame height: 3024 instead of 3036 px (-0.4 %).
The sensor part number is not confirmed in this comparison: we compare by resolution, pixel size, frame or line rate and interface.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: +10.04 % in width, +7.68 % in height. A larger image circle is required — check that the existing lens covers the active area.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Connector: M12 X-Code instead of RJ45 — the system has to be checked.
The lens mount differs: check the fit and the flange distance of your current lens.
Pixel size, X: 2 instead of 1.85 µm (+8.11 %); the field of view will change with the same lens.
Pixel size, Y: 2 instead of 1.85 µm (+8.11 %); the field of view will change with the same lens.
Frame height: 3024 instead of 3036 px (-0.4 %).
The sensor part number is not confirmed in this comparison: we compare by resolution, pixel size, frame or line rate and interface.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: +10.04 % in width, +7.68 % in height. A larger image circle is required — check that the existing lens covers the active area.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Connector: M12 X-Code instead of RJ45 — the system has to be checked.
The lens mount differs: check the fit and the flange distance of your current lens.
Pixel size, X: 2 instead of 1.85 µm (+8.11 %); the field of view will change with the same lens.
Pixel size, Y: 2 instead of 1.85 µm (+8.11 %); the field of view will change with the same lens.
Frame height: 3024 instead of 3036 px (-0.4 %).
The sensor part number is not confirmed in this comparison: we compare by resolution, pixel size, frame or line rate and interface.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: +10.04 % in width, +7.68 % in height. A larger image circle is required — check that the existing lens covers the active area.
Scope of the comparison. The comparison covers only the specifications listed, taken from published sources. It is not a statement of compatibility or interchangeability. Third-party names and trademarks are used solely to identify the products being compared; the rights to them belong to their respective owners. Software, SDK, connectors, mount and dimensions require a separate engineering check.