IDS Imaging U3-3070CP-C-HQ Rev.2.2 alternative from Hikrobot
Hikrobot replacement options for the IDS Imaging U3-3070CP-C-HQ Rev.2.2: the closest models, what differs (resolution, frame rate, interface, sensor) and what to check before switching.
Comparison with Hikrobot models
No confirmed drop-in replacement. The closest Hikrobot models differ in frame rate, interface, resolution and sensor. Each difference is listed below.
To confirm a model for your line, send: current lens, working distance, field of view, object speed, cable length and software.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Connector: Type-C instead of USB 3.0 micro-B, screwable — the system has to be checked.
Frame rate: 104.8 instead of 114.5 fps (-8.47 %).
Frame height: 1536 instead of 1544 px (-0.52 %).
Frame width: 2048 instead of 2064 px (-0.78 %).
The sensor part number is not confirmed in this comparison: we compare by resolution, pixel size, frame or line rate and interface.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -0.78 % in width, -0.52 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Connector: Type-C instead of USB 3.0 micro-B, screwable — the system has to be checked.
Frame rate: 104.8 instead of 114.5 fps (-8.47 %).
Frame height: 1536 instead of 1544 px (-0.52 %).
Frame width: 2048 instead of 2064 px (-0.78 %).
The sensor part number is not confirmed in this comparison: we compare by resolution, pixel size, frame or line rate and interface.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -0.78 % in width, -0.52 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Connector: Type-C instead of USB 3.0 micro-B, screwable — the system has to be checked.
Frame rate: 104.8 instead of 114.5 fps (-8.47 %).
Frame height: 1536 instead of 1544 px (-0.52 %).
Frame width: 2048 instead of 2064 px (-0.78 %).
The sensor part number is not confirmed in this comparison: we compare by resolution, pixel size, frame or line rate and interface.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -0.78 % in width, -0.52 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
Scope of the comparison. The comparison covers only the specifications listed, taken from published sources. It is not a statement of compatibility or interchangeability. Third-party names and trademarks are used solely to identify the products being compared; the rights to them belong to their respective owners. Software, SDK, connectors, mount and dimensions require a separate engineering check.