Hikrobot replacement options for the SICK I2D301C-2RCA11: the closest models, what differs (resolution, frame rate, interface, sensor) and what to check before switching.
Comparison with Hikrobot models
No confirmed drop-in replacement. The closest Hikrobot models differ in frame rate, interface, resolution and sensor. Each difference is listed below.
To confirm a model for your line, send: current lens, working distance, field of view, object speed, cable length and software.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Connector: M12 X-Code instead of RJ45 — the system has to be checked.
Frame height: 1080 instead of 1088 px (-0.74 %).
Frame width: 1440 instead of 1456 px (-1.1 %).
The sensor part number is not confirmed in this comparison: we compare by resolution, pixel size, frame or line rate and interface.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -1.1 % in width, -0.74 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Connector: M12 X-Code instead of RJ45 — the system has to be checked.
Frame height: 1080 instead of 1088 px (-0.74 %).
Frame width: 1440 instead of 1456 px (-1.1 %).
The sensor part number is not confirmed in this comparison: we compare by resolution, pixel size, frame or line rate and interface.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -1.1 % in width, -0.74 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Frame rate: 78.2 instead of 79 fps (-1.01 %).
Frame height: 1080 instead of 1088 px (-0.74 %).
Frame width: 1440 instead of 1456 px (-1.1 %).
The sensor part number is not confirmed in this comparison: we compare by resolution, pixel size, frame or line rate and interface.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -1.1 % in width, -0.74 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
PoE power: optional instead of yes — the system has to be checked.
Frame rate: 65.8 instead of 79 fps (-16.71 %).
Frame height: 1080 instead of 1088 px (-0.74 %).
Frame width: 1440 instead of 1456 px (-1.1 %).
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -1.1 % in width, -0.74 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
PoE power: optional instead of yes — the system has to be checked.
Frame rate: 65.8 instead of 79 fps (-16.71 %).
Frame height: 1080 instead of 1088 px (-0.74 %).
Frame width: 1440 instead of 1456 px (-1.1 %).
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -1.1 % in width, -0.74 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
Why it is not a drop-in replacement
The table scrolls to the right →
Parameter
I2D301C-2RCA11
MV-CU016-10GC V2.0
What it changes
Interface
GigE · 1 Gbit/s · RJ45 · PoE
GigE · 1 Gbit/s · RJ45 · PoE: optional
PoE power: optional instead of yes — the system has to be checked.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Frame rate: 65.2 instead of 79 fps (-17.47 %).
Frame height: 1080 instead of 1088 px (-0.74 %).
Frame width: 1440 instead of 1456 px (-1.1 %).
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -1.1 % in width, -0.74 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
Scope of the comparison. The comparison covers only the specifications listed, taken from published sources. It is not a statement of compatibility or interchangeability. Third-party names and trademarks are used solely to identify the products being compared; the rights to them belong to their respective owners. Software, SDK, connectors, mount and dimensions require a separate engineering check.