Daheng Imaging MARS-2440-35GTM-NF alternative from Hikrobot
Hikrobot replacement options for the Daheng Imaging MARS-2440-35GTM-NF: the closest models, what differs (resolution, frame rate, interface, sensor) and what to check before switching.
Comparison with Hikrobot models
Hikrobot MV-CH240-10TM-C-NN matches the MARS-2440-35GTM-NF on resolution, frame rate and interface.
Check before ordering:
Frame height: 4600 instead of 4608 px (-0.17 %).
Software, SDK, connectors, mount and dimensions require a separate engineering check.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: 0 % in width, -0.17 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
To confirm a model for your line, send: current lens, working distance, field of view, object speed, cable length and software.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Frame height: 4600 instead of 4608 px (-0.17 %).
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: 0 % in width, -0.17 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Pixel size, X: 2.5 instead of 2.74 µm (-8.76 %); the field of view will change with the same lens.
Pixel size, Y: 2.5 instead of 2.74 µm (-8.76 %); the field of view will change with the same lens.
Frame width: 5120 instead of 5328 px (-3.9 %).
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -12.32 % in width, +1.38 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
The lens mount differs: check the fit and the flange distance of your current lens.
Pixel size, X: 2.5 instead of 2.74 µm (-8.76 %); the field of view will change with the same lens.
Pixel size, Y: 2.5 instead of 2.74 µm (-8.76 %); the field of view will change with the same lens.
Frame width: 5120 instead of 5328 px (-3.9 %).
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -12.32 % in width, +1.38 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Pixel size, X: 2.5 instead of 2.74 µm (-8.76 %); the field of view will change with the same lens.
Pixel size, Y: 2.5 instead of 2.74 µm (-8.76 %); the field of view will change with the same lens.
Frame width: 5120 instead of 5328 px (-3.9 %).
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -12.32 % in width, +1.38 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
Scope of the comparison. The comparison covers only the specifications listed, taken from published sources. It is not a statement of compatibility or interchangeability. Third-party names and trademarks are used solely to identify the products being compared; the rights to them belong to their respective owners. Software, SDK, connectors, mount and dimensions require a separate engineering check.