Daheng Imaging MER2-2000-19U3M-W90 alternative from Hikrobot
Hikrobot replacement options for the Daheng Imaging MER2-2000-19U3M-W90: the closest models, what differs (resolution, frame rate, interface, sensor) and what to check before switching.
Comparison with Hikrobot models
Hikrobot MV-CT0MU0200/R matches the MER2-2000-19U3M-W90 on resolution, frame rate and interface.
Check before ordering:
Connector: Type-C instead of USB3 Micro-B — the system has to be checked.
Frame height: 3648 instead of 3672 px (-0.65 %).
Frame rate: 19.3 instead of 19.6 fps (-1.53 %).
Frame width: 5472 instead of 5496 px (-0.44 %).
Software, SDK, connectors, mount and dimensions require a separate engineering check.
The lens mount differs: check the fit and the flange distance of your current lens.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -0.44 % in width, -0.65 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
To confirm a model for your line, send: current lens, working distance, field of view, object speed, cable length and software.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Connector: Type-C instead of USB3 Micro-B — the system has to be checked.
Frame rate: 19.3 instead of 19.6 fps (-1.53 %).
The lens mount differs: check the fit and the flange distance of your current lens.
Frame height: 3648 instead of 3672 px (-0.65 %).
Frame width: 5472 instead of 5496 px (-0.44 %).
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -0.44 % in width, -0.65 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Frame rate: 19.2 instead of 19.6 fps (-2.04 %).
The lens mount differs: check the fit and the flange distance of your current lens.
Frame height: 3648 instead of 3672 px (-0.65 %).
Frame width: 5472 instead of 5496 px (-0.44 %).
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -0.44 % in width, -0.65 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Frame rate: 19.2 instead of 19.6 fps (-2.04 %).
The lens mount differs: check the fit and the flange distance of your current lens.
Frame height: 3648 instead of 3672 px (-0.65 %).
Frame width: 5472 instead of 5496 px (-0.44 %).
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -0.44 % in width, -0.65 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
Scope of the comparison. The comparison covers only the specifications listed, taken from published sources. It is not a statement of compatibility or interchangeability. Third-party names and trademarks are used solely to identify the products being compared; the rights to them belong to their respective owners. Software, SDK, connectors, mount and dimensions require a separate engineering check.