IDS Imaging GV-5240FA-C-HQ Rev.1.2 alternative from Hikrobot
Hikrobot replacement options for the IDS Imaging GV-5240FA-C-HQ Rev.1.2: the closest models, what differs (resolution, frame rate, interface, sensor) and what to check before switching.
Comparison with Hikrobot models
No confirmed drop-in replacement. The closest Hikrobot models differ in interface, pixel size and sensor. Each difference is listed below.
To confirm a model for your line, send: current lens, working distance, field of view, object speed, cable length and software.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Connector: RJ45 instead of GigE M12, screwable — the system has to be checked.
Pixel size, X: 4.8 instead of 5.3 µm (-9.43 %); the field of view will change with the same lens.
Pixel size, Y: 4.8 instead of 5.3 µm (-9.43 %); the field of view will change with the same lens.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -9.43 % in width, -9.43 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Connector: RJ45 instead of GigE M12, screwable — the system has to be checked.
PoE power: optional instead of yes — the system has to be checked.
Pixel size, X: 4.8 instead of 5.3 µm (-9.43 %); the field of view will change with the same lens.
Pixel size, Y: 4.8 instead of 5.3 µm (-9.43 %); the field of view will change with the same lens.
The sensor part number is not confirmed in this comparison: we compare by resolution, pixel size, frame or line rate and interface.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -9.43 % in width, -9.43 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Connector: RJ45 instead of GigE M12, screwable — the system has to be checked.
PoE power: optional instead of yes — the system has to be checked.
Pixel size, X: 4.8 instead of 5.3 µm (-9.43 %); the field of view will change with the same lens.
Pixel size, Y: 4.8 instead of 5.3 µm (-9.43 %); the field of view will change with the same lens.
The sensor part number is not confirmed in this comparison: we compare by resolution, pixel size, frame or line rate and interface.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -9.43 % in width, -9.43 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
Why it is not a drop-in replacement
The table scrolls to the right →
Parameter
GV-5240FA-C-HQ Rev.1.2
MV-CU013-A0GC V2.0
What it changes
Interface
GigE · 1 Gbit/s · GigE M12, screwable · PoE
GigE · 1 Gbit/s · RJ45 · PoE: optional
Connector: RJ45 instead of GigE M12, screwable — the system has to be checked.
Interface
GigE · 1 Gbit/s · GigE M12, screwable · PoE
GigE · 1 Gbit/s · RJ45 · PoE: optional
PoE power: optional instead of yes — the system has to be checked.
Pixel size
5.3 × 5.3 µm
4.8 × 4.8 µm
Pixel size, X: 4.8 instead of 5.3 µm (-9.43 %); the field of view will change with the same lens.
Pixel size
5.3 × 5.3 µm
4.8 × 4.8 µm
Pixel size, Y: 4.8 instead of 5.3 µm (-9.43 %); the field of view will change with the same lens.
Sensor
e2v EV76C560
OnSemi PYTHON1300 (inferred; the datasheet has not been checked)
Confirm from the datasheet
Specification comparison
The table scrolls to the right →
Specification
Competitor
Our model
Difference
Resolution
1280 × 1024 px
1280 × 1024 px
Matches
Pixel size
5.3 × 5.3 µm
4.8 × 4.8 µm
Trade-off
Sensor
e2v EV76C560
OnSemi PYTHON1300 (inferred; the datasheet has not been checked)
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
Connector: RJ45 instead of GigE M12, screwable — the system has to be checked.
Pixel size, X: 4.8 instead of 5.3 µm (-9.43 %); the field of view will change with the same lens.
Pixel size, Y: 4.8 instead of 5.3 µm (-9.43 %); the field of view will change with the same lens.
The sensor part number is not confirmed in this comparison: we compare by resolution, pixel size, frame or line rate and interface.
With the same lens and working distance, on the full frame, the field of view changes: -9.43 % in width, -9.43 % in height. A smaller image circle is required — part of the field the existing lens covers goes unused.
Scope of the comparison. The comparison covers only the specifications listed, taken from published sources. It is not a statement of compatibility or interchangeability. Third-party names and trademarks are used solely to identify the products being compared; the rights to them belong to their respective owners. Software, SDK, connectors, mount and dimensions require a separate engineering check.